Respect, Fear and Control in Education and Society In many countries it is now illegal to hit children in school. In some countries, such as Sweden, it is also illegal to hit them in their homes. One result of this shift in social thinking is that children are becoming less afraid of their teachers, and of authority in general. In the past, the fear of physical punishment was often one of the main ways of maintaining control of the classroom and of society.
Let me rephrase to make it more general.
Answering this question was essentially the goal of this book, so I will Obedience vs responsibility to the section in the book that address key issues. If we all Obedience vs responsibility sensory things and emotional things differently; who among us is to be trusted as the arbiter of ethical truth?
Understanding the correct ethical path is relatively easy, simply use the golden rule. The first part of the book is relatively short and provides a proof of this axiom. The section on understanding ethics addresses how an individual or group can derive ethical truths.
There are baseline requirements for understanding ethics. The section on when things go wrong tries to address two common forms of malice. The section on personal framing addresses how we all see the world through skewed eyes.
With ethical understanding we can hopefully see the world more clearly and help others to do the same. Diving down the rabbit hole addresses your concerns straight on… at least I think so.
The driving analogy for ethics is used to illustrate through analogy the reality of a distribution of knowledge and understanding exists; which is a varied as the number of individuals. You can train people to get better but they have to care enough about improvement to do so.
Some care deeply, others are deeply apathetic.
In general the system works but it could always be improved. People and cultures vary in their development; the rules of the road vary a bit too. Good driving practices are timeless and transcend culture. The discussion on cultural memes provides a window in how leaders can get good people to do bad things.
I compared ethics to love because both exist in the mind, so they are hard to prove. Individuals and cultures acknowledge both love and ethics.
Ethics is constant, ethical climates can ebb and flow. In sexy ethicsI discuss the how many of the seemingly relativistic moral codes as they apply to ethics often have core unchanging ethical principles that they are derived from.
I also acknowledge here and in other sections that cultures are typically the arbiters of justice; they define what is right and wrong, and the people implicitly agree by their obedience to the rules.
People make up cultures and both have a tendency to be wrong a good deal of the time; so their is always room for improvement. Again, this is where ethical knowledge and understanding is useful.
So hopefully that addresses the gray… On the God issue, that is partly more complex and partly simple. I highly doubt anyone of faith will read it because to do so would be against the first commandment.
The power of the meme of God for self-sensorship truly amazes me. I was raised in the Catholic faith but was liberal enough to question it and my search for knowledge and understanding led me to seek a better understanding of the people and world around me.
By questioning and thinking about God I came to understand the meme. God is a powerful idea, but it is simply that. This book is in part thanks to religion, to an unethical corporate culture, and to the power of an inquisitive mind.
This was the second book I wrote, the first one was on corporate ethics; which has not been published yet. To discuss corporate ethics, I had to first define ethics. If you are concerned about questioning your faith, if the thought of that creates an inner fear, then I will let you in on a little secret; there is nothing to fear.
I have been to that mountain top, there is no boogie man; just your own fear. Let go of the fear and start asking questions… the world will light up. The simple answer to the God problem as it relates to ethics is two fold. Ethical knowledge has to be innate because otherwise we would lack free will.
So unless you want to go down the philosophical road of Determinism, I suggest we all concede that ethical knowledge is innate whether biological or God-given if you prefer.
The philosophical argument against philosophical Skepticism is provided in how we know ethics. It continues in the Epistemology of Ethics. The issue with God or religion being the source of ethical knowledge, i. Hitler, Stalin, and all of the other crazies leaders made themselves gods.Obedience Training One on One Training.
On various days and times during the week, we offer one on one basic training to dog owners. These sessions aim to help dogs who have behavioral issues. Are students obedient or responsible in the classroom? Part 1. 36 Pages. Are students obedient or responsible in the classroom?
Part 1. Part 1. Download.
Are students obedient or responsible in the classroom? Part 1. Uploaded by. P. Chatterjee In the first chapter, obedience and responsibility were briefly explored from a social and an. Black Dog, Second Chance BDSC Animals RescueGroups. Either route you go, you are saving a life!!!
(clip taken from plombier-nemours.com). Public vs. Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India and others [Writ Petition (C) No. of ] In Re: Muslim Women's Quest for Equality Vs. Jamiat Ulma-I-Hind. Social conformity and obedience are two very powerful phenomenons in human behavior and sociology.
In this lesson, we discuss the two types of social conformity and differentiate between. Campus Watch demands academic integrity in North American Middle East studies (MES) programs. It reviews and critiques MES bias with the aim of improving education – keeping watch on scores of professors at hundreds of universities.